admin

Full of Eastern Promise

December 11, 2012 in art, discussion, notice, research

We’ve been quiet for a while because our official first programme of events and projects has ended, but we’re now thinking about what to do next. In January/February 2013 we’ll be publishing our first policy document, gathering some of our conclusions about what we’ve discovered over the past two years and sharing information we think all professional artists need to know, what best practice might look like in an ideal world, and who are the wrong ‘uns to always avoid (and why).

Two related possibilities are firstly the expansion of the group to include more professional East Anglian artists in the very successful learning, career development and peer support activities we’ve been doing on a small scale; secondly to facilitate mentoring by and for artists, not just on day-to-day career matters but on ethical, economic and personal matters (e.g. the gender pay gap, or managing a career as an artist when you have children) similar to some of the issues we’ve covered on this blog and at our live events. We know already that many artists are grappling with these issues on their own. We’d also like to bring artists together to address some of the failures, omissions and mis-steps of institutions in the region with regard to artist support. We already have some horror stories of our own– mentors who did it in a spirit of ego and competition instead of a spirit of generosity, so-called “experts” who provided totally basic (and sometimes wrong) information as if it was a great revelation, advisers who didn’t even bother to find out basic information about the person they were meant to be helping, lazy old handouts or Powerpoints about general matters, artist groups that are all talk and no action, and so on. We want to do this right, so help us by sharing how you think it should be done.

Some background information and research material:

http://www.artquest.org.uk/articles/view/mentoring-one-to-one-sessions

http://www.culturalleadership.org.uk/353/

Case studies from the Cultural Leadership Programme, including our Julie:

Julie Freeman
http://www.culturalleadership.org.uk/376/

Helen Carnac
http://www.culturalleadership.org.uk/354/

Members of Market Project will be discussing possibilities and experiences with mentoring and artist groups here, but everyone with an interest is encouraged to comment and contribute especially if you’re an artist who’d like to become part of an artist-led support network, or if you’d like to learn from or mentor other arts professionals. What knowledge or contacts do you think you need but don’t know how to get? If you’ve been mentored, critiqued or been critiqued, or worked with a group of artists or studio group, what were the good things about those things and what were the things you thought were wrong?

admin

Blatant self promotion- It’s the Market Project book

June 15, 2012 in art, books, notice, slideshow

The Market Project book is now available to buy. It’s a limited edition of 250. It costs £20 + £5 postage and packing, from art book shops (soon) or directly from us. Contact transactions@marketproject.org.uk to buy one. We’ve been told it’s rather beautiful by people who know what they’re talking about…

Our commissioned writers (with their artist subjects in parentheses) are: Iain Aitch (Alistair Gentry), Matthew Bowman (Elaine Tribley), Laura Havlin (Helen Judge), Martin Kemp (Julie Freeman), Mark Leahy (Martha Winter), Carol Mavor (Annabel Dover), David Rayson (Annabelle Shelton) and Cherry Smyth (David Kefford). The texts are as diverse and unique as the artists themselves, with scholarly critical examinations joined by frank interviews, fairy stories, or other poetic, creative responses.

Read more about the book or read excerpts from the commissioned writing by clicking the PUBLISHING menu above.

david kefford

A Little Patch of Ground

May 16, 2013 in art

How can you measure that art has an impact? In this brave new world, as circumstances drive arts organisations forward to become more business-minded and media savvy, we need to drill deeper into our understanding of arts audiences.

I have been thinking about how artists can really make a difference in the societies they find themselves in.  By the way when I talk of arts, I include music and drama not just painting, sculpture and crafts.  So after walking the dog to clear my head I am refreshed and hopefully raring to go!

I know from bitter personal experience that maintaining your own reflective practice in a utilitarian culture where your examination results justify your financial resources is extremely difficult.  Artists are the sector’s frontline, however it would appear that the basic working rights of this vital part of the workforce have been at best neglected, and at worst, ignored by those who are supposed to be our advocates.  In freeing the composer or artist to concentrate fully on their creative work, the effect is often to catalyse a whole scene; a whole genre or practice.

I am presently preparing to put on an exhibition of contemporary art and film in my local shopping centre which is completely self-funded and with no support from the local arts services whatsoever.  The current government’s idea of volunteers doing everything in the community for free (and by the way, who is now expected to co-ordinate, train, and ensure safety of these volunteers and the vulnerable people they are helping now that those jobs have been eroded too!? Nothing is for Free) will only fuel expectations of community artists doing things for free.

This complex attempt to metabolise or integrate multiple modes of experiencing oneself and the world both points to and reflects the very struggle of art making.  I have always found this experience fascinating and illuminating.  More experience does not equate with better decision making.

A text by Robert Good

 

The Seventh Marketeer

April 7, 2013 in art

I think I’m the seventh anyway.
Hello, my name is Alex Pearl, I am a blogger. It is a while since I have blogged regularly but I thought as I had been invited to join this esteemed organisation that I would try to get on it with greater frequency. Nearmiss
I feel like a car starting in the cold.
We visited London yesterday to see Laure Provoust’s lovely film of her holiday in Italy. Laure is my facebook friend so I feel close to her, and like her work. Although at this point, it should be noted that I am also friends with Anita Zabludovicz, someone who claims to be an executive director of Debut Contemporary, a number of young ladies who keep asking me to look at their websites and say “lol” a lot, and many other folk who clearly think it would be great to be “connected” to me. Networking and trying to be an artist have been closely “connected” in the last few years with lots of opportunities to “connect” advertised everywhere. In fact there are many courses, run by other artists, teaching more artists how to become more “connected”. Its a bit of a dirty secret but I used to be considered somewhat of an expert in this field myself.

On the way home from London I showed Annabel Richard Serra’s public sculpture “Fulcrum” outside Liverpool Street Station. It is now possibly the biggest pissoir in the world, which just goes to show how things can set out to be one thing but turn out to be something else entirely.
Fulcrum

Annabel

Palace Art Fair

March 20, 2013 in art, event, exhibition

Come along I will be showing work in this with Renée Pfister

imgres

Annabelle

This ‘Me’ of Mine

February 25, 2013 in art

http://thismeofmine.wordpress.com/

Discovered today our own Annabel Dover is one of the artists participating in this project.

I like this project!

Annabelle Shelton

Annabel

Some Fantastic Things

January 15, 2013 in art

Some lovely things I have seen recently:

Sankta Lucia at Westminster Cathedral.

Mindy Lee’s ‘buffet’ at WW Gallery.

WW Gallery shop.

Eleanor Moreton’s portrait painting in Ceri  Hand Gallery, the perfect place for it.

Inshore Fishing at Rokeby Gallery.

The incredibly intricate cut paper flowers of Mrs Delany (born 1700 died 1788) who took up her craft in her seventies.

Hugo Jeager’s photographs of Hitler’s apartment, for Time Magazine

Georgia Hayes show at Transition Gallery.

photo 3(1)

photo 1(2)

photo 5

photo 1(1)

photo 2(1)

photo 4(1)photo 4

david kefford

Between a stroke and a smack

November 16, 2012 in art education, discussion, interview, research

Extract from a conversation between Ronnie Simpson and Phyllida Barlow in a catalogue produced for her exhibition, STINT at the Mead Gallery, 2008;

RS:  one of the myths surrounding your work is your reluctance to have anything to do with the commercial art world?

PB:  I’m having a whole change of mind about this.  Also, I don’t know if that is accurate.  There’s nothing wrong with selling work.  I’ve never had a problem with that.  I think we don’t know how to resist capitalism – we’re not equipped to do it.  Where we’ve placed ourselves within an art world means we’ve signed up for capitalism whether we like it or not.  If we want to disenfranchise ourselves from capitalism, I think it means an absolutely radical shift in so many ways, where art and life perhaps have to be absolutely entwined – where art and life are one and the same thing.

I want to think more about this, but I’m suggesting that to exist without any relationship to the art world demands making your art outside of it – and what does that mean, in reality, and what does that entail?  Of course, it’s possible.  But the art world is voracious, and has the capacity to devour anything and everything.  An ‘outsider’ becomes just as devourable as an ‘insider’.  Such is the success of this capitalist art world we’re all having to live with.

I don’t think about my work in relation to any commercially driven incentives.  It has to be about the urge to do it, first and foremost.  And to reveal something, to be surprised, to let the work lead into uncharted waters, to let go.  Not for selling to be the prime motive.  However, fees and contracts for commissions etc. are becoming increasingly important.  They are an economic incentive, very much so.

admin

Sluice 2012, 22-24 October

October 18, 2012 in art, books, event, exhibition, gallery, notice, slideshow

Exhibition of works for sale in a silent, blind and anonymous auction; these have been donated by over fifty artists (including Market Project’s Annabel Dover and Alistair Gentry) to contribute to the return of the artist-led and artist-centred Sluice Art Fair in 2013. Alistair was on Sluice Art Fair’s discussion panel in 2011, with his Market Project hat on. Our David’s Aid & Abet is also involved, as is our former guest Cathy Lomax’s Transition Gallery.

See the work Monday 22 October- Wednesday 24 October, 12-6 daily. Then come to the book launch and reception at Hanmi Gallery, 30 Maple Street, London W1T 6HA from 6-9pm on Wednesday 24th to see who has been lucky enough to walk away with the work they bid for.

PS: Hanmi has a sister gallery in Seoul, which is in fact Gangnam Style.

Alistair

Basic tenets of commercial art galleries: “price discrimination and maximum revenue extraction”

October 2, 2012 in art

An interesting article about the maintenance of profit, prestige and artificial scarcity in the commercial art world.

“The art trade doesn’t exist outside of economic theory and consumer protection, but it does have its own set of rules that may range from the objectionable to the legally unenforceable. “

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-grant/do-art-gallery-practices_b_1922981.html

Alistair

Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading

September 23, 2012 in art, discussion

If you’re paying a (so-called) art gallery to show your work, or you’re paying by the metre for your wall space, then you’re not in a professional artist-gallerist relationship and you’re not in the art world; you are a customer of a service industry, and customers in the UK (and of course elsewhere) have clearly defined and legally enforceable rights. One of the sock puppets in this notorious thread about Debut Contemporary mockingly taunted that if anybody really thought pay-to-play vanity galleries were doing anything wrong, or that anybody could do anything about their conduct, then we should go to the Office of Fair Trading. Having recently gone through the OFT’s guidance on the subject, I can wholeheartedly concur with our sock puppet friend because since the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 came into force, companies that engage in unfair or deceptive business practices can be forced to comply with reasonable business ethics, and face civil or criminal prosecution if they don’t.

Download and read the entire document at the link– it’s worth it just for your general information when dealing with any company or service. But a number of practices mentioned definitely reminded me of things I’ve seen in mailouts, “opportunities” (sic) to win art prizes, and on the shoddy websites belonging to the vanity galleries that seem to be popping up almost every month, like poisonous mushrooms. I’m sure many of you have seen this nonsense, too. Let’s play vanity gallery bingo. Does the great unsolicited offer to show your work (for a small fee…) contain any of these?

NOTE: All following information except my notes are extracted verbatim from the OFT’s guidance document, intended as pointers and for general information only. None of this is a substitute for familiarising yourself with the actual document and the real legislation first hand. Don’t ever rely on a blog or on something you might have read somewhere at some point if you’re going to court; take proper, professional legal advice if you think you need it.

Commercial practices which are considered unfair in all circumstances and which are prohibited.

(7) Falsely stating that a product will only be available for a very limited time, or that it will only be available on particular terms for a very limited time, in order to elicit an immediate decision and deprive consumers of sufficient opportunity or time to make an informed choice.

(19) Claiming in a commercial practice to offer a competition or prize promotion without awarding the prizes described or a reasonable equivalent.

(20) Describing a product as ‘gratis’, ‘free’, ‘without charge’ or similar if the consumer has to pay anything other than the unavoidable cost of responding to the commercial practice and collecting or paying for delivery of the item. (Example) A trader advertises a ‘free’ gift. He then tells consumers that in order to receive their ‘free’ gift they need to pay an extra fee. This would breach the CPRs (consumer protection regulations).

NOTE: My specific vanity gallery example, one based on a recent promotional email that was sent to me, would be a “free showcase” or “free mailout” that you can only get by paying a membership, subscription or service fee. This clearly and unequivocally violates subsection 20. Read the rest of this entry →